How marketing leaders can get a clearer view of workload, priorities and campaign bottlenecks
Marketing teams are rarely short of ideas, requests or deadlines. The harder problem is knowing what is genuinely important, what the team can realistically deliver and where work is slowing down before a campaign misses its moment.
When work arrives through emails, Teams messages, meetings and informal conversations, leaders tend to see the symptoms first: a delayed launch, a frustrated stakeholder or a team that appears busy but cannot move the most important work forward. That is not a visibility problem in the narrow sense. It is an operating problem.
A clear view of workload should help a marketing leader answer five simple questions:
What work is coming into the team, and why?
What has been agreed as a priority?
What is already in progress?
Where is work waiting, blocked or being reworked?
What needs a decision now?
Without those answers, planning becomes reactive. The loudest request wins, people start work before it is properly briefed, and campaign bottlenecks only become visible when the deadline is already close.
Why marketing workload is difficult to see clearly
Most marketing leaders have some form of plan. There may be a campaign calendar, a content plan, a spreadsheet of requests or a project board. But these often show only one part of the picture.
The calendar may show planned activity but not the unplanned requests competing for the same people. The project plan may show tasks but not why they matter. And a status update may confirm that work is delayed without showing whether the issue is capacity, an unclear brief, a missing approval or a dependency outside the team.
Gartner’s 2025 research found that 84% of CMOs reported high levels of strategic dysfunction, including unclear, excessive or conflicting objectives. It also found that 61% said their marketing plans were primarily driven by operational needs, such as prioritising work, rather than a proactive market-oriented approach.
For an in-house marketing team, this often feels familiar. There is a campaign plan, but then a senior stakeholder requests a new presentation. Sales needs an urgent asset. A product update changes the messaging. Legal feedback arrives late. The team is not failing to work hard. It is trying to deliver too many competing priorities through a process that does not make trade-offs visible.
Our guide to getting more control of campaigns, content and creative work explores how a clearer route for requests and feedback can help. The next step is giving leaders a useful view of the workload those requests create.
"Working with Naomi & The Workflow People was an absolute game changer. She completely transformed our use of monday.com... I can't recommend her enough! she’s efficient, insightful, and genuinely great to work with. Total pro."
Rihana Carey - Brand Manager, Keep Hammering Collective
A workload view is more than a task list
A long list of tasks does not tell you whether the team is overloaded. Nor does a plan full of completed tasks prove that work is flowing well.
A useful marketing workload view brings four things together:
Demand: the requests, campaigns and planned activity entering the team.
Priority: the business reason, urgency and decision-maker behind each item.
Capacity: who is working on what, and whether there is room to take on more.
Status: where work is sitting, waiting or repeatedly moving backwards.
This gives leaders a far better starting point for decisions. Instead of asking, “Can we fit this in?”, they can ask, “What would this displace?” That is a more honest and useful conversation.
It also helps to separate work that is active from work that is merely open. A campaign waiting for approval is not progressing, even if it still appears on someone’s task list. The same is true of a brief waiting for information, a design waiting for sign-off or a landing page waiting for final copy.
The aim is not to create more reporting. It is to make the work already happening easier to understand.
The five views every marketing leader needs
A clear view of incoming demand
Start with the work entering the team. This includes planned campaigns, ongoing content, events, sales enablement, internal requests and reactive work.
Every request does not need a long form or a committee decision. But it should contain enough information to make a sensible call:
What is being requested?
Who is asking for it?
What outcome is expected?
When is it needed, and why?
Is there a fixed deadline or simply a preferred date?
Who can confirm the priority?
Finally, how can all the details of the request be captured (e.g. language requirements, legal requirements, brand colours to use etc etc)
This avoids the common situation where the marketing team is expected to infer the business case, scope and urgency after the work has already landed with them.
It also shows patterns over time. If urgent requests are arriving from the same area of the business every week, the issue may not be individual behaviour. There may be a planning, process or ownership gap worth fixing.
A shared understanding of priority
Priority should not mean whoever asks most often, holds the most senior job title or has the nearest deadline.
Marketing leaders need a simple, visible way to distinguish between work that is essential to a live campaign or commercial commitment, important but flexible, useful when capacity allows, or not currently a priority.
The labels matter less than the agreement behind them. If the team and its stakeholders do not share the same definition of priority, people will continue to start work on items that later get paused, changed or quietly abandoned.
This is particularly important when teams are under pressure. Gartner found that CMOs who planned 18 months or more ahead were more likely to report strong marketing and business performance. That does not mean every marketing team needs an inflexible long-term plan. It does mean strategic work needs protection from the constant pull of short-term requests.
Visibility also needs to reflect how the business asks questions. One client team needed to show regional leaders which marketing activity supported their part of the business. Tagging work consistently by region and business area provides a way to build that view without assembling a separate report from scratch. It also gives leaders a clearer basis for discussing priorities with those stakeholders.
A regular prioritisation review gives leaders a place to make those trade-offs openly, rather than leaving individual team members to negotiate them one request at a time.
A realistic view of capacity
Capacity is not simply the number of people in the team. It is the amount of focused time and relevant skill available once meetings, approvals, stakeholder management and existing commitments are taken into account.
This is where many campaign plans become optimistic.
Microsoft’s 2025 Work Trend Index found that employees using Microsoft 365 were interrupted by meetings, emails or notifications every two minutes on average. Marketing teams also deal with work that is difficult to estimate in advance, including review cycles, changing briefs and last-minute requests.
A campaign calendar shows when activity is due, but not necessarily how much work sits behind it. During a client dashboard review, that distinction came up directly:
“It’s not so much the planned timeline, is it? It’s estimated like amount of work you’ve got actually being done.”
A capacity view should therefore be practical rather than overly precise. It might show work assigned to each person or role, the campaign stage each item is in, planned versus unplanned work, high-effort items and fixed deadlines, and whether work depends on someone outside the marketing team.
The purpose is not to monitor every hour. It is to spot overload early enough to reassign work, change scope, move a deadline or say no before the team is already stretched too thin.
A properly configured monday.com setup can bring this information into one connected dashboard, rather than leaving it spread across separate documents and conversations.
A view of where work is getting stuck
Campaign bottlenecks are often obvious once someone looks in the right place.
Work may be accumulating in “awaiting approval”. Several pieces of content may be waiting for the same subject matter expert. A designer may be unable to start because campaign copy is not final. Or a task may have been marked “in progress” for weeks because nobody is clear on the next action.
These are not always capacity issues. They are often hand-off and decision issues.
AI can also help marketing leaders pick out potential risks across campaign updates. Several teams might mention waiting for the same approval, or flag dependencies that could affect a launch date. Bringing those signals together can help a leader see where to investigate before the delay becomes more serious.
Look for:
Work that has been in the same stage for too long.
Tasks with no next owner.
Repeated changes to the brief or deadline.
Items marked as blocked, but without a clear reason.
Approvals waiting with one person or team.
Campaign tasks that are technically complete but cannot move forward.
The Kanban Guide describes work in progress as the items moving between a defined start and finish point. For marketing teams, agreeing those stages is useful because it makes waiting visible. A campaign asset is not just “open” or “done”. It may be awaiting a brief, in production, awaiting feedback, approved or scheduled.
Once those stages are clear, monday.com dashboards and reporting view can help leaders see what needs attention without asking every team member for an update.
A way to reduce avoidable chasing
Not every delay needs a meeting. Many follow-ups are predictable: an approval is overdue, a deadline is approaching, a task is ready for the next owner or a request is missing key information.
That is where simple automation can help. The right monday.com automations can send reminders, notify the next owner, flag overdue approvals and keep work moving without adding more manual admin.
But automation should support a clear process, not hide a broken one.
If no one knows who can approve a campaign, an automated reminder will not solve the problem. If a brief is consistently incomplete, the answer is to improve the request process. Build the workflow first, then automate the predictable parts.
AI can help turn regular project updates into a concise management summary, highlighting reported risks, progress and decisions that need attention. That gives leaders a useful starting point for their review and reduces the need to read every update individually.
Better visibility leads to better decisions
The value of a clear workload view is not that every campaign will run perfectly. Marketing work changes, and unexpected priorities will always appear. The value is being able to make the trade-offs deliberately.
When a new urgent request arrives, a leader can see what is already committed, what is waiting for decisions and what may need to move. When a campaign is delayed, the team can identify whether the issue is capacity, approval, scope or a dependency. And when the same bottleneck keeps appearing, it can be addressed as a process issue rather than treated as another one-off firefight.
That is how marketing teams move from reacting to requests to managing demand with more confidence.
With consistent project information in place, AI can help summarise what is happening and draw attention to potential problems. Leaders still need to check the context and decide what to do next.
If your team needs a clearer way to manage internal requests, priorities and capacity, join our free Internal Marketing Requests Masterclass. Or, if you would like to discuss a more connected monday.com setup, get in touch with The Workflow People.